🎓 AI rules: Schools, universities, training
AI for admissions, grading and proctoring is high-risk; emotion recognition of students is banned.
Typical AI uses and their risk level
Minimal; check facts and copyright.
High risk from 2 Dec 2027.
High risk; attention or emotion tracking is prohibited.
Transparency; age-appropriate safeguards.
What to do
- Set school rules for AI use by pupils and teachers.
- Never enter pupils’ personal data into consumer AI tools.
- Keep a teacher responsible for every grade.
Common pitfalls
- AI “plagiarism detectors” produce false positives — never sanction on their result alone.
Examples
Fine as support if the teacher reviews and grades; remove pupils’ names before pasting.
Rules that apply
Applies to anyone who develops AI (provider), uses AI in their business (deployer), imports or distributes it in the EU — also to companies outside the EU if the output is used in the EU. Private, non-professional use is excluded.
In forceGDPRFor most companies GDPR matters more than the AI Act: it decides whether you may put customer or employee data into an AI tool at all. In Slovenia it is supplemented by ZVOP-2 and supervised by the Information Commissioner.
In forceZVOP-2AI on cameras (face recognition, behaviour analysis) and biometric attendance systems fall under strict ZVOP-2 rules — often they are simply not allowed. The Information Commissioner has published opinions on AI, e.g. on misleading use of AI systems and on accountability.
General information, not legal advice — consult a lawyer for borderline cases. Regulations reviewed on 29 Sep 2026.